Is AI Dangerous? A Call for Responsibility in the Age of Advanced Systems

As with any powerful force, artificial intelligence (AI) comes with its own set of challenges and risks, prompting many industry leaders and experts to urge for more stringent accountability and governance.

Is AI dangerous?

In the continuously advancing era of digital technology, we’re surrounded by innovations that once seemed the stuff of science fiction. However, as with any powerful force, artificial intelligence (AI) comes with its own set of challenges and risks, prompting many industry leaders and experts to urge for more stringent accountability and governance.

The Vanguard Voices in AI’s Call for Accountability

Among the most passionate and authoritative voices in this discourse are key figures from the academic world of AI. Their calls for greater responsibility and accountability in the sector, particularly on the cusp of the AI Safety Summit, signals the depth of their concern. As reported by The Guardian, these aren’t just fringe voices but comprise 23 experts, some of whom have been pivotal in shaping the landscape of artificial intelligence.

Two of these influential figures are Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio, both lauded with the 2018 Turing Award. They’re often referred to as the “godfathers of AI”, testament to their immense contributions to the discipline. Their advocacy for greater oversight and responsibility in the realm of AI development and deployment is significant.

Hinton’s recent resignation from his prestigious role at Google Brain, done to foster a more open discussion about AI’s potential risks, speaks volumes about his dedication to the safe evolution of this technology. Concurrently, Bengio has been upfront in expressing his views. He communicated to Information Age his conviction that state control is essential for the judicious advancement of AI.

The comprehensive policy document these luminaries have backed provides a blueprint for global governments. Among its recommendations are:

  • Holding tech corporations accountable for any avoidable damage their systems might inflict.
  • Mandating safety measures if AI enterprises identify dangerous capabilities within their solutions.
  • Allocating a substantial portion, about a third, of all governmental R&D budgets, alongside a similar percentage of corporate resources, to enhance system safety and ethical implementations.
  • Instituting a robust licensing framework for the inception of cutting-edge AI algorithms.
  • Encouraging independent scrutiny of AI research institutes.

Professor Stuart Russell’s comments encapsulate the shared sentiment of these experts. He declared “Advanced AI systems aren’t merely sophisticated toys. To ramp up their capabilities without due diligence on safety is not only unwise but also utterly reckless.”

The Mounting Concerns and Warnings in AI

With the incredible potential AI holds, it’s also accompanied by profound challenges and responsibilities. AI’s pervasive nature, especially in powerful systems, threatens social stability if not judiciously governed. Such strong, unchecked systems can inadvertently amplify societal disparities, weaken our shared societal foundations, and even pave the way for extensive criminal activities.

The risks don’t just end there. Advanced AI systems, if developed recklessly, risk becoming autonomous entities with their own set of objectives, potentially beyond human control. For instance, the GPT-4 AI model, which powers tools like ChatGPT, demonstrates alarming capabilities, highlighting the pressing need for cautious development and rigorous oversight.

Adding to the chorus of caution are over a thousand tech leaders, researchers, and personalities such as Elon Musk, Steve Wozniak, and Andrew Yang. They’ve publicly voiced their concerns via an open letter, shedding light on the “profound risks to society and humanity” that AI poses. The letter highlights the ongoing race among developers to birth even more powerful digital entities – ones that might surpass our comprehension and control.

Chatbots, like ChatGPT and others, underscore this advancement. Their ability to converse human-like, draft extensive essays, and execute complex tasks like code-writing, while impressive, also come with pitfalls. The rapid race to develop these tools signifies a seismic shift in tech leadership. Yet, they are not without flaws, often disseminating misinformation.

Elon Musk, among others, has urged for a pause in the development of AI systems, especially those surpassing the capabilities of models like GPT-4. The aim? To implement “shared safety protocols” and ensure these systems are beneficial and their associated risks are manageable.

Such concerns aren’t unfounded. OpenAI’s GPT-4, even before its official release, was tested for hazardous use cases. Researchers found that it could suggest illicit activities, create misleading content, and even propagate falsehoods that could have dire real-world implications.

The Call for Swift and Decisive Action

While tech experts like Yann LeCun view the idea of AI posing existential threats to humanity as exaggerated, the underlying message is clear: AI’s rapid advancement requires immediate, comprehensive, and global attention.

Regrettably, political understanding and action haven’t kept pace with technological evolution. For instance, US policymakers seem to lack comprehensive insight into this transformative technology. Though the European Union took steps in 2021 to propose a law to govern potentially harmful AI technologies, the pace of such regulatory advancements remains slow. As AI systems, particularly neural networks and large language models (LLMs), become increasingly sophisticated, the urgency for effective governance escalates.

Such systems, which can generate content autonomously, pose risks as they can occasionally disseminate inaccuracies and fabrications. This “hallucination” phenomenon is particularly concerning because of the confidence with which these systems relay information, making it challenging for users to discern fact from fiction.

In the face of these challenges, the tech community remains divided on the way forward. While some advocate for a moratorium on advanced AI development, others believe that the inherent risks are manageable with the right precautions and that halting progress is not the solution.

A Two-pronged Approach: Regulation and Responsibility

For those in the latter camp, the argument is that AI, like any other technological advancement in history, comes with its challenges. However, rather than stifling innovation, a balance can be achieved by focusing on responsible development and deployment. By establishing rigorous guidelines, implementing checks and balances, and fostering an industry culture centred on ethics and safety, they argue, AI can indeed coexist with society beneficially.

Moreover, the swift advancements in AI also present an array of unprecedented opportunities: medical breakthroughs, efficient energy solutions, tackling global crises, and much more. To halt such progress might deprive humanity of potentially life-altering benefits.

Yet, the crux of the matter remains: accountability is paramount. Whether one advocates for a complete halt or measured advancement, there is unanimous agreement that AI firms must be held accountable for their creations.

From a regulatory perspective, there is a desperate need for international standards. Just as with other global challenges – climate change, nuclear weapons, and pandemics, to name a few – AI’s implications are not restricted by national boundaries. International collaboration is not just beneficial; it’s essential.

The policies endorsed by AI luminaries like Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio present a promising starting point. Their recommendations for tech company liability, compulsory safety measures, substantial funding allocation for AI safety research, licensing systems for AI models, and independent audits underscore the depth and breadth of the issue at hand.

The Road Ahead

The road to responsible AI is undeniably complex. It demands the concerted effort of governments, tech companies, academics, and civil society. The industry needs to foster a culture of openness, where failures and flaws are acknowledged and rectified, rather than concealed. As Geoffrey Hinton’s resignation from Google Brain indicates, open discourse on AI’s potential risks is crucial.

Yet, the path also promises rewards. A well-regulated, responsibly-developed AI ecosystem could usher in an “AI summer” – a period where humanity can reap the immense benefits of AI while ensuring societal well-being and safety.

For the general public, awareness is the first step. As users and beneficiaries of AI, understanding its capabilities and implications is crucial. Equipped with knowledge, people can advocate for responsible AI practices and support regulations that safeguard both individual and collective interests.

In the words of Professor Stuart Russell, advanced AI systems aren’t mere toys. As we continue to integrate them into the fabric of our societies, it’s imperative to remember their profound implications. Just as fire can warm a home or burn it down, AI, in the hands of a responsible society, can illuminate the world. But left unchecked, it can set ablaze the very foundations of what we hold dear.

To return to the question, is AI dangerous? As we stand on the brink of an AI-driven future, one thing is clear: the age of advanced systems demands an age of advanced responsibility. The clarion call has been sounded by the very pioneers of the industry. It’s now up to governments, industries, and society at large to respond, shaping an AI future that is not only innovative but also inclusive, safe, and responsible.

For a human driven approach to all of your IT support and requirements, get in touch with the team here at MICT, we’d be happy to see how we can help. Fill out our contact form or call us on 0151 708 0702



The New York Times. (2023). “Elon Musk and Others Call for Pause on A.I., Citing ‘Profound Risks to Society’.”

The Guardian. (2023). “Key AI academics call for industry responsibility.”

Information Age. (2023). Interview with Yoshua Bengio on state control in AI development.

Russell, Stuart. (2023). Statement on the importance of advanced AI systems. University of California, Berkeley.

< Back to all news